This article aims at developing a brief critical review on the political performance, between the years of 1958 and 1964, of the Brazilian Communist Party (PCB), then the leading Brazilian Left Party. The goal is to bring back some elements for a better understanding of the reasons which led the left parties and the social movements to be defeated by the<\/em><\/p>\n military coup in 1964. It is centered on the analysis of the \u201cimage of Brazil\u201d made by leaders and intellectuals connected to PCB, about the Brazilian reality during the historic period, when PCB developed a nacionalist program against the power of the land monopoly and the imperialism, seen as parasites of the national resorts. The national liberating strategy truly showed itself unable to act as an hegemonic force to congregate popular sectors in the endurance and struggle against the more dynamic fractions of the Brazilian bourgeoisie that intended, opposing to participate in a nationalistic project, to consolidate the development of the monopolistic capitalism in the country.<\/em><\/p>\n Palavras Chave: Hist\u00f3ria do PCB; Estrat\u00e9gia nacional-libertadora; Golpe civil-militar de1964.<\/p>\n *Doutor em Hist\u00f3ria pela UFF. Professor Adjunto da FSD<\/p>\n Fonte: http:\/\/www.docentesfsd.com.br\/artigos.php?id=187<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\n\n\nCr\u00e9dito: Lattes\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDescaminhos da Revolu\u00e7\u00e3o Brasileira: o PCB e a constru\u00e7\u00e3o da estrat\u00e9gia nacional-libertadora (1958-1964)\n <\/a>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-c62-debate"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p659gw-fI","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=974"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/974\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pcb.org.br\/portal2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.docentesfsd.com.br\/images\/pdf.gif?w=747\")
Fazer download do artigo completo<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n